Bush v. Doral Country Club, Inc.
421 So. 2d 190, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28142
Opinion
The summary judgment entered below in this negligence action is reversed because the defendant-movant did not conclusively demonstrate either its non-liability as a matter of law or that the plaintiff could not establish his right to recovery at trial. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); see Sims v. Helms, 345 So.2d 721, 724 (Fla.1977).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bush v. Doral Country Club, Inc., 421 So. 2d 190, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28142 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
421 So. 2d 190 (Bush v. Doral Country Club, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Holl v. Talcott
191 So. 2d 40 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)
Sims v. Helms
345 So. 2d 721 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)