Bush v. Consolidated Underwriters

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Bush v. Consolidated Underwriters

90 So. 2d 580, 1956 La. App. LEXIS 899

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided October 25, 1956·No. No. 8547·Published

Opinion

HARDY, Judge.

This action for workman’s compensation was consolidated for trial and for purposes of appeal with the case of Richards v. Consolidated Underwriters, La.App., 90 So.2d 577.

The facts, the principles of law and our conclusions are fully set forth in the case cited, supra.

Accordingly, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment dismissing the call in indemnity is annulled, reversed and set aside and there is now judgment in favor of Consolidated Underwriters and against Alvin W. Curtis for the full amount paid by Consolidated Underwriters in satisfaction of the judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff, William O. Bush, together with all costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARDY, Judge.

This action for workman’s compensation was consolidated for trial and for purposes of appeal with the case of Richards v. Consolidated Underwriters, La.App., 90 So.2d 577.

The facts, the principles of law and our conclusions are fully set forth in the case cited, supra.

Accordingly, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment dismissing the call in indemnity is annulled, reversed and set aside and there is now judgment in favor of Consolidated Underwriters and against Alvin W. Curtis for the full amount paid by Consolidated Underwriters in satisfaction of the judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff, William O. Bush, together with all costs.

Bush v. Consolidated Underwriters, 90 So. 2d 580, 1956 La. App. LEXIS 899 (La. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

90 So. 2d 580 (Bush v. Consolidated Underwriters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related