Bush v. City of Cincinnati

18 Ohio C.C. 605
CourtOhio Circuit Courts
DecidedJanuary 15, 1899
StatusPublished

This text of 18 Ohio C.C. 605 (Bush v. City of Cincinnati) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bush v. City of Cincinnati, 18 Ohio C.C. 605 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1899).

Opinion

In this case we are of the opinion that the petition on file signed by certain property owners, filed in Board of Ad[606]*606ministration, March 29, 1895, and remaining there at the time the ordinance for the improvement was passed (the ■signers not attempting to withdraw the same), is binding ■upon the signers thereof, notwithstanding the endorsement thereon made April 5, 1895, in Board of Administration: “Filed until such time as petitioners agree to pay any deficiency that may arise by reason of non-collectibility of assessment should improvement be made.”

Fred. Hertenstein, for Plaintiffs. Corporation Counsel, contra.

That being the only question submitted to us for decision^ decree may be taken in accordance with section 2272, Revised Statutes.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Ohio C.C. 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bush-v-city-of-cincinnati-ohiocirct-1899.