Bush v. Carloading & Distributing Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Bush v. Carloading & Distributing Co.

210 Ill. App. 399, 1918 Ill. App. LEXIS 271

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided April 29, 1918·No. Gen. No. 23,910·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Commerce, § 33a*—what is proper forum to pass upon railroad rates and tariffs. The Interstate Commerce Commission is the proper forum to pass upon the comparative fairness of through rates and local tariffs. 4. Carriers, § 211*—when expert evidence relating to interstate commerce tariff rates is admissible. In an action to recover back money alleged to have been erroneously refunded as an overcharge on an interstate shipment, it is not error to permit an expert to explain matters connected with the interstate commerce tariff rates and schedules.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Commerce, § 33a*—what is proper forum to pass upon railroad rates and tariffs. The Interstate Commerce Commission is the proper forum to pass upon the comparative fairness of through rates and local tariffs. 4. Carriers, § 211*—when expert evidence relating to interstate commerce tariff rates is admissible. In an action to recover back money alleged to have been erroneously refunded as an overcharge on an interstate shipment, it is not error to permit an expert to explain matters connected with the interstate commerce tariff rates and schedules.

Bush v. Carloading & Distributing Co., 210 Ill. App. 399, 1918 Ill. App. LEXIS 271 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

210 Ill. App. 399 (Bush v. Carloading & Distributing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related