Bush v. Barnard

8 Johns. 407
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1811·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The promise which was offered to be proved was a conditional promise ; and the plaintiff was ' bound to show that he had offered, and was ready to accept, the specific articles. In the case of Davis v. Smith, (4 Esp. N. P. Cases, 36.) it was ruled that a promise to pay a debt, barred by the statute of limitations, when able, was a conditional promise, and the plaintiff ivas bound to show that the defendant was of sufficient ability to pay the debt. This case comes within the principle of that decision, and the court deny the motion on that ground, without' touching the point raised at the trial.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bush v. Barnard, 8 Johns. 407 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1811).

8 Johns. 407 (Bush v. Barnard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Work v. Beach
12 N.Y.S. 12 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)
Wilson v. Gould
28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 446 (New York Supreme Court, 1880)
Wilcox v. Williams
5 Nev. 206 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1869)
Wakeman v. . Sherman
9 N.Y. 85 (New York Court of Appeals, 1853)
Tompkins v. Brown
1 Denio 247 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1845)