Bush v. Alabama Department of Corrections

985 So. 2d 399, 2007 Ala. LEXIS 233, 2007 WL 3238686
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedNovember 2, 2007
Docket1051342
StatusPublished

This text of 985 So. 2d 399 (Bush v. Alabama Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bush v. Alabama Department of Corrections, 985 So. 2d 399, 2007 Ala. LEXIS 233, 2007 WL 3238686 (Ala. 2007).

Opinion

SEE, Justice.

Melvin Ross Bush’s appeal was originally filed with the Court of Civil Appeals. That court transferred the appeal to this Court on the basis that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over Bush’s appeal. In an opinion released on September 28, 2007, Collins v. Alabama Department of Corrections, 982 So.2d 1078 (Ala.2007), this Court overruled Block v. Alabama Department of Corrections, 923 So.2d 342 (Ala.Crim.App.2005); Beck v. Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles, 907 So.2d 1096 (Ala.Crim.App.2005); Jacobs v. Alabama Department of Corrections, 900 So.2d 485 (Ala.Crim.App.2004); Collins v. Alabama Department of Corrections, 911 So.2d 739, 743 (Ala.Crim.App.2004); McConico v. Alabama Department of Corrections, 893 So.2d 577 (Ala.Crim.App.2004); and Boykins v. State, 862 So.2d 594 (Ala.Crim.App.2003), to the extent that these cases hold that the Court of Criminal Appeals “ ‘would have jurisdiction to review certio-rari petitions challenging [Alabama Department of Correction] actions involving an inmate’s conduct [while incarcerated], while the Court of Civil Appeals would have jurisdiction to review petitions challenging decisions based on factors other than the inmate’s conduct [while incarcerated].’ ” Collins, 982 So.2d at 1081 (quoting McConico, 893 So.2d at 581 n. 5). We also held in Collins that the Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction to review all certiorari petitions challenging actions by the Department of Corrections, “regardless of when the relevant conduct of the inmate occurred.” 982 So.2d at 1081. Based on our decision in Collins, we transfer Bush’s appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeals.

APPEAL TRANSFERRED.

WOODALL, SMITH, BOLIN, and PARKER, JJ., concur. COBB, C.J., and MURDOCK, J., recuse themselves.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beck v. ALABAMA BD. OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
907 So. 2d 1096 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2005)
Jacobs v. ALABAMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
900 So. 2d 485 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2004)
Collins v. ALABAMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
982 So. 2d 1078 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2007)
McConico v. ALABAMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
893 So. 2d 577 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2004)
Block v. ALABAMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
923 So. 2d 342 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2005)
Collins v. ALABAMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
911 So. 2d 739 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2004)
Boykins v. State
862 So. 2d 594 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
985 So. 2d 399, 2007 Ala. LEXIS 233, 2007 WL 3238686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bush-v-alabama-department-of-corrections-ala-2007.