Bush Terminal Co. v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance
127 N.E. 909, 228 N.Y. 575, 1920 N.Y. LEXIS 1040
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Cardozo, McLaughlin, Crane and Elkus, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bush Terminal Co. v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance, 127 N.E. 909, 228 N.Y. 575, 1920 N.Y. LEXIS 1040 (N.Y. 1920).
127 N.E. 909 (Bush Terminal Co. v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Courteen Seed Co. v. Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corp.
157 N.E. 272 (New York Court of Appeals, 1927)