Bush Terminal Co. v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance
127 N.E. 909, 228 N.Y. 575, 1920 N.Y. LEXIS 1040
This text of 127 N.E. 909 (Bush Terminal Co. v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bush Terminal Co. v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance, 127 N.E. 909, 228 N.Y. 575, 1920 N.Y. LEXIS 1040 (N.Y. 1920).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Cardozo, McLaughlin, Crane and Elkus, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Courteen Seed Co. v. Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corp.
157 N.E. 272 (New York Court of Appeals, 1927)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
127 N.E. 909, 228 N.Y. 575, 1920 N.Y. LEXIS 1040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bush-terminal-co-v-globe-rutgers-fire-insurance-ny-1920.