Bush, Lanny Marvin
This text of Bush, Lanny Marvin (Bush, Lanny Marvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-22,600-04
EX PARTE LANNY MARVIN BUSH, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 2602-C IN THE 42ND DISTRICT COURT FROM COLEMAN COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and
sentenced to life imprisonment. The Eleventh Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Bush v.
State, No. 11-14-00129-CR (Tex. App.—Eastland Aug. 11, 2016)(not designated for publication).
Applicant contends, among other things, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance
due to a conflict of interest. Applicant alleges that counsel also represented a State’s witness and
prevented that witness from being called to testify at Applicant’s trial. Applicant also contends that
his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to brief the issue of the 2
trial court’s denial of a mistrial due to the improper admission of Applicant’s prior criminal history.
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these
circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294
(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court
shall order trial counsel and appellate counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective
assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art.
11.07, § 3(d).
If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the
performance of Applicant’s trial counsel and appellate counsel was deficient and, if so, whether
counsel’s deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other
findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of
Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must
be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court. 3
Filed: August 22, 2018 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bush, Lanny Marvin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bush-lanny-marvin-texcrimapp-2018.