Buschor v. IDC Realty Services, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Buschor v. IDC Realty Services, Inc.

871 So. 2d 309, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5829, 2004 WL 894551

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 28, 2004

DocketNo. 3D03-1214

StatusPublished

This text of 871 So. 2d 309 (Buschor v. IDC Realty Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buschor v. IDC Realty Services, Inc., 871 So. 2d 309, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5829, 2004 WL 894551 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Deborah A. Buschor appeals the denial of unemployment compensation benefits. In the present case conflicting testimony was offered by the parties. It was the responsibility of the referee to resolve the conflicts, which he did in this case in favor of the employer. See Wallace v. Zahn Dental Co., Inc., 618 So.2d 382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). This court is not allowed to overturn the referee’s factual findings, as long as there was competent, substantial evidence at the hearing which supports the findings. See Gonzalez v. Master Flowers, Inc., 605 So.2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). As we see no legal basis on which to disturb the referee’s findings, the order is affirmed. See also St. Augustine Church v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 754 So.2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Stahl v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 502 So.2d 78 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Deborah A. Buschor appeals the denial of unemployment compensation benefits. In the present case conflicting testimony was offered by the parties. It was the responsibility of the referee to resolve the conflicts, which he did in this case in favor of the employer. See Wallace v. Zahn Dental Co., Inc., 618 So.2d 382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). This court is not allowed to overturn the referee’s factual findings, as long as there was competent, substantial evidence at the hearing which supports the findings. See Gonzalez v. Master Flowers, Inc., 605 So.2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). As we see no legal basis on which to disturb the referee’s findings, the order is affirmed. See also St. Augustine Church v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 754 So.2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Stahl v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 502 So.2d 78 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

871 So. 2d 309, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5829, 2004 WL 894551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buschor-v-idc-realty-services-inc-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack