Busch v. Wal-Mart

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Busch v. Wal-Mart

712 N.W.2d 771, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 275, 2006 WL 1172415

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedApril 28, 2006

DocketA06-161

StatusPublished

This text of 712 N.W.2d 771 (Busch v. Wal-Mart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Busch v. Wal-Mart, 712 N.W.2d 771, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 275, 2006 WL 1172415 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed December 22, 2005, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

Helen M. Meyer

Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI