Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Busch v. Mary A. Riddle Co.

Busch v. Mary A. Riddle Co.

114 A. 348, 92 N.J. Eq. 265, 7 Stock. 265, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 329
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 21, 1920
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 114 A. 348 (Busch v. Mary A. Riddle Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Busch v. Mary A. Riddle Co., 114 A. 348, 92 N.J. Eq. 265, 7 Stock. 265, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 329 (N.J. 1920).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Bergen, Minturn, Iyalisoh, .Black, Katzenbaoh, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson—14. For reversal.—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Weede v. Iowa Southern Utilities Co. of Delaware
2 N.W.2d 372 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1942)
Bentley v. Colgate
163 A. 98 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1932)
Rogers v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New York
60 F.2d 114 (Second Circuit, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 A. 348, 92 N.J. Eq. 265, 7 Stock. 265, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/busch-v-mary-a-riddle-co-nj-1920.