Buscemi v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Buscemi v. Warden

152 A.2d 824, 220 Md. 659, 1959 Md. LEXIS 560

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedJuly 6, 1959

DocketP. C. No. 3

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 152 A.2d 824 (Buscemi v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buscemi v. Warden, 152 A.2d 824, 220 Md. 659, 1959 Md. LEXIS 560 (Md. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Application for leave to appeal is denied for the reasons set out in the opinion of the court below. On the first point, that his sentence as a second offender was illegal, because Code (1957), Art. 27, sec. 300, was enacted subsequent to his first conviction in 1949, see also Taylor v. Warden, 213 Md. 646, and Beard v. Warden, 211 Md. 658, which dispose of the point. Cf. Buscemi v. Warden, 215 Md. 620.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Application for leave to appeal is denied for the reasons set out in the opinion of the court below. On the first point, that his sentence as a second offender was illegal, because Code (1957), Art. 27, sec. 300, was enacted subsequent to his first conviction in 1949, see also Taylor v. Warden, 213 Md. 646, and Beard v. Warden, 211 Md. 658, which dispose of the point. Cf. Buscemi v. Warden, 215 Md. 620.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 A.2d 824, 220 Md. 659, 1959 Md. LEXIS 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buscemi-v-warden-md-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack