Buscemi-Sanz v. Hudson Meridian Constr. Group, LLC

2018 NY Slip Op 1385
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 1, 2018
Docket5847 100207/11
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 1385 (Buscemi-Sanz v. Hudson Meridian Constr. Group, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buscemi-Sanz v. Hudson Meridian Constr. Group, LLC, 2018 NY Slip Op 1385 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Buscemi-Sanz v Hudson Meridian Constr. Group, LLC (2018 NY Slip Op 01385)
Buscemi-Sanz v Hudson Meridian Constr. Group, LLC
2018 NY Slip Op 01385
Decided on March 1, 2018
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 1, 2018
Acosta, P.J., Friedman, Richter, Kapnick, JJ.

5847 100207/11

[*1]Sara Buscemi-Sanz, Plaintiff,

v

Hudson Meridian Construction Group, LLC, et al., Defendants.

Hudson Meridian Construction Group, LLC, et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents,

v

VIS Industries, also known as, VIS Plumbing Heating and Mechanical, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.


Bartlett, LLP, Mineola (Douglas Langholz of counsel), for appellant.

Pillinger Miller Tarallo, LLP, Elmsford (Patrice Coleman of counsel), for respondents.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard F. Braun, J.), entered January 10, 2017, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied summary judgment dismissing the third-party claims for common-law and contractual indemnification and contribution, and breach of contract, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Because there is evidence that third-party defendant VIS installed copper piping in the basement apartment where plaintiff tripped, issues of fact exist as to whether the accident arose, in whole or in part, from acts or omissions of VIS.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: MARCH 1, 2018

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 1385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buscemi-sanz-v-hudson-meridian-constr-group-llc-nyappdiv-2018.