Busby v. Winn & Lovett Miami, Inc.

80 So. 2d 675
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 1, 1955
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 80 So. 2d 675 (Busby v. Winn & Lovett Miami, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Busby v. Winn & Lovett Miami, Inc., 80 So. 2d 675 (Fla. 1955).

Opinion

80 So.2d 675 (1955)

William BUSBY, Appellant,
v.
WINN & LOVETT MIAMI, INC., a Florida corporation, d/b/a Kwik Chek, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division A.

June 1, 1955.

*676 John Red Lake, Miami, for appellant.

Blackwell, Walker & Gray, Miami, for appellee.

DREW, Chief Justice.

Appellant, plaintiff below, sought damages for loss of services, consortium and companionship of his wife and for medical expenses incurred by him on her behalf, all alleged to be the result of injury to the wife caused by the negligence of appellee. Motion to dismiss was duly made by the defendant and granted by the court. It is from that order that this appeal is taken.

It is clear from the language used by the trial court in its order that it was of the opinion that the husband's cause of action was "derivative of that of the wife," and that the complaint was dismissed solely because the wife had not participated in the action. This view was erroneous. A tort of a third person which causes personal injury to a married woman gives rise to two causes of action — one for her own personal injuries and the other for the husband's loss of her society and services and for medical expenses incurred by him on her behalf. The two causes of action are separate and distinct and the husband's action may be maintained without joinder of the wife. Waller v. First Savings & Trust Co., 103 Fla. 1025, 138 So. 780. See Womach v. City of St. Joseph, 201 Mo. 467, 100 S.W. 443, 10 L.R.A.,N.S., 140; 41 C.J.S. Husband and Wife, § 401, page 890; 27 Am.Jur. 116, Sec. 516.

Reversed.

TERRELL, SEBRING and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kampsky v. Meester
M.D. Florida, 2023
PHILIP MORRIS USA INC. v. BERNICE MCCALL
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017
Randall v. Walt Disney World Co.
140 So. 3d 1118 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Saunders v. Dickens
103 So. 3d 871 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
ACandS, Inc. v. Redd
703 So. 2d 492 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Metropolitan Dade County v. Reyes
688 So. 2d 311 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Taylor v. Orlando Clinic
555 So. 2d 876 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Orange County v. Piper
523 So. 2d 196 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Habelow v. Travelers Ins. Co.
389 So. 2d 218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Food Fair, Inc. v. Anderson
382 So. 2d 150 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Gates v. Foley
247 So. 2d 40 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)
Raydel, Ltd. v. Medcalfe
162 So. 2d 910 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
O'Quinn v. Central Truck Lines, Inc.
157 So. 2d 539 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Carter v. Duval Engineering & Contracting Co.
128 So. 2d 143 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 So. 2d 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/busby-v-winn-lovett-miami-inc-fla-1955.