Busby v. State

283 S.E.2d 96, 159 Ga. App. 76, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2497
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 25, 1981·No. 62167·Published

Opinion

Quillian, Chief Judge.

This appeal was taken from an order revoking the appellant’s probation. Appellate counsel filed a motion to withdraw on the ground that the appeal was wholly frivolous. Anders v. California, 386 [77] U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493); Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406). All requirements of Anders and Bethay having been met, after an examination of the record and transcript we granted counsel permission to withdraw.

Decided June 25, 1981. J. W. Morgan, District Attorney, for appellee.

Appellant’s sole enumeration of error contends that the trial judge in the probation revocation order failed to follow the recommendation of the probation officer. We find no merit in this contention and our independent review of the record and transcript reveals no reversible error.

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Busby v. State, 283 S.E.2d 96, 159 Ga. App. 76, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2497 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981).

283 S.E.2d 96 (Busby v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Bethay v. State
229 S.E.2d 406 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)