BUSBY Et Al. v. HARRIS, JUDGE, Et Al.

Supreme Court

BUSBY Et Al. v. HARRIS, JUDGE, Et Al.

370 U.S. 48, 82 S. Ct. 1167, 8 L. Ed. 2d 398, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1199

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMay 28, 1962

Docket728, Misc

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 370 U.S. 48 (BUSBY Et Al. v. HARRIS, JUDGE, Et Al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

BUSBY Et Al. v. HARRIS, JUDGE, Et Al., 370 U.S. 48, 82 S. Ct. 1167, 8 L. Ed. 2d 398, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1199 (1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon the Solicitor General’s suggestion of mootness and upon an examination of the entire record, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that court with directions to dismiss the proceedings upon the ground that the case is moot.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Upon the Solicitor General’s suggestion of mootness and upon an examination of the entire record, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that court with directions to dismiss the proceedings upon the ground that the case is moot.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

370 U.S. 48, 82 S. Ct. 1167, 8 L. Ed. 2d 398, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/busby-et-al-v-harris-judge-et-al-scotus-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack