Busbee-Bailey Tomato Co. v. Bailey

463 So. 2d 1255, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12590
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 27, 1985·No. No. AX-484·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We set aside the summary judgment on the authority of Fish Carburetor Corporation v. Great American Insurance Company, 125 So.2d 889 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961), [1256]*1256and Howarth Trust v. Howarth, 310 So.2d 57 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), and remand for further proceedings consistent herewith, including the taking of additional testimony, if any, to be determined by the trial court.

Summary judgment is set aside and the cause remanded.

BOOTH and SHIVERS, JJ., and TILLMAN PEARSON (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Busbee-Bailey Tomato Co. v. Bailey, 463 So. 2d 1255, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12590 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

463 So. 2d 1255 (Busbee-Bailey Tomato Co. v. Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Suggs v. Allen
563 So. 2d 1132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Zygmont v. Smith
548 So. 2d 902 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Gutierrez v. Bermudez
540 So. 2d 888 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)