Busbee-Bailey Tomato Co. v. Bailey

463 So. 2d 1255, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12590
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 27, 1985
DocketNo. AX-484
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 463 So. 2d 1255 (Busbee-Bailey Tomato Co. v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Busbee-Bailey Tomato Co. v. Bailey, 463 So. 2d 1255, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12590 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We set aside the summary judgment on the authority of Fish Carburetor Corporation v. Great American Insurance Company, 125 So.2d 889 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961), [1256]*1256and Howarth Trust v. Howarth, 310 So.2d 57 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), and remand for further proceedings consistent herewith, including the taking of additional testimony, if any, to be determined by the trial court.

Summary judgment is set aside and the cause remanded.

BOOTH and SHIVERS, JJ., and TILLMAN PEARSON (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Suggs v. Allen
563 So. 2d 1132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Zygmont v. Smith
548 So. 2d 902 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Gutierrez v. Bermudez
540 So. 2d 888 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
463 So. 2d 1255, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/busbee-bailey-tomato-co-v-bailey-fladistctapp-1985.