Burya v. Lake Metroparks Board of Park Commissioners

Ohio Supreme Court

Burya v. Lake Metroparks Board of Park Commissioners

867 N.E.2d 829, 114 Ohio St. 3d 35

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 20, 2007

DocketNos. 2006-2078 and 2006-2094

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 867 N.E.2d 829 (Burya v. Lake Metroparks Board of Park Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burya v. Lake Metroparks Board of Park Commissioners, 867 N.E.2d 829, 114 Ohio St. 3d 35 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the negative, and the judgment of the court of appeals holding that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to appellant is reversed on the authority of Elston v. Howland Local [36]*36Schools, 113 Ohio St.3d 314, 2007-Ohio-2070, 865 N.E.2d 845. The judgment of the trial court granting appellant’s motion for summary judgment is reinstated.

Rosplock & Perez, Richard J. Perez, and Jesse M. Schmidt, for appellees. Law Offices of Steven K. Kelley and Cornelius J. O’Sullivan, for appellant. Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would answer the certified question in the affirmative and affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the negative, and the judgment of the court of appeals holding that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to appellant is reversed on the authority of Elston v. Howland Local [36]*36Schools, 113 Ohio St.3d 314, 2007-Ohio-2070, 865 N.E.2d 845. The judgment of the trial court granting appellant’s motion for summary judgment is reinstated.

Rosplock & Perez, Richard J. Perez, and Jesse M. Schmidt, for appellees. Law Offices of Steven K. Kelley and Cornelius J. O’Sullivan, for appellant. Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would answer the certified question in the affirmative and affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

867 N.E.2d 829, 114 Ohio St. 3d 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burya-v-lake-metroparks-board-of-park-commissioners-ohio-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack