Burwell v. Teets

Supreme Court

Burwell v. Teets

350 U.S. 808

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 10, 1955·No. No. 283·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The motion for stay of execution of death sentence and the peti[809]*809tion for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit are granted. The judgment of that court is reversed, and the case is remanded so that the petitioner’s application for a certificate of probable cause maybe entertained on its merits. House v. Mayo, 324 U. S. 42, 48 (1945).

Petitioner pro se. Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General of California, Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney General, and Arlo E. Smith, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The motion for stay of execution of death sentence and the peti[809]*809tion for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit are granted. The judgment of that court is reversed, and the case is remanded so that the petitioner’s application for a certificate of probable cause maybe entertained on its merits. House v. Mayo, 324 U. S. 42, 48 (1945).

Petitioner pro se. Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General of California, Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney General, and Arlo E. Smith, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

Burwell v. Teets, 350 U.S. 808 (1955).

Pincite

350 U.S. 808 (Burwell v. Teets) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related