Burwell v. Signature Real Estate Group

Opinion

* * *

TERISA RENITA BURWELL, Case No. 2:25-cv-00284-RFB-EJY

Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

SIGNATURE REAL ESTATE GROUP, et al.,

Defendants.

Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 9) of the Honorable Elayna J. Youchah, United States Magistrate Judge, entered on June 18, 2025. A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct “any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by July 2, 2025. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. /// l IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 9) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's claim alleging a violation of the automatic 4] stay arising from her bankruptcy filing is DISMISSED without prejudice, but without leave to amend in this Court. Plaintiff may refile this claim in the United States Bankruptcy Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's claim arising under NRS 118A.300 is DISMISSED with prejudice. DATED: July 17, 2025. < D RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-