Burwell (Keith) Vs. State
This text of Burwell (Keith) Vs. State (Burwell (Keith) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
KEITH ARLANDO BURWELL, No. 78990 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Re sp ondent. FILED AUG 3 0 2019 EMMETT.' A. BROWN
:YLER ig* 174 1A- E 7fff e°Utiv DEPUTY CLERK •
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a pretrial motion to dismiss. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Mary Kay Holthus, Judge. This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from a district court order denying a pretrial motion to dismiss. See NRS 177.015(1)(b); see also State v. Kosek, 112 Nev. 244, 911 P.2d 1196 (1996). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal, and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
J. Pickering
J. Parraguirre Cadish
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A cc: Hon. Mary Kay Holthus, District Judge Keith Arlando Burwell Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk Clark County Public Defender
(0) 1947A 4,401.• 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Burwell (Keith) Vs. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burwell-keith-vs-state-nev-2019.