Burttram v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Burttram v. State

846 So. 2d 1201, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8295, 2003 WL 21275999

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 4, 2003

DocketNo. 2D02-3503

StatusPublished

Cited by15 cases

This text of 846 So. 2d 1201 (Burttram v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burttram v. State, 846 So. 2d 1201, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8295, 2003 WL 21275999 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Burttram appeals the judgment and sentence that were entered after this court remanded his case to the trial court. See Burttram v. State, 780 So.2d 224 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Counsel filed briefs asserting no meritorious argument pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We agree with counsel that no meritorious issues exist, and we therefore affirm. We write only to correct a scrivener’s error. Second-degree murder is a first-degree felony punishable by life, not a second-degree felony as indicated on the judgment. See § 782.04(2), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1998). We direct the trial court to correct the judgment to indicate that the conviction is for a first-degree felony.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, C.J., and SILBERMAN and COVINGTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Burttram appeals the judgment and sentence that were entered after this court remanded his case to the trial court. See Burttram v. State, 780 So.2d 224 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Counsel filed briefs asserting no meritorious argument pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We agree with counsel that no meritorious issues exist, and we therefore affirm. We write only to correct a scrivener’s error. Second-degree murder is a first-degree felony punishable by life, not a second-degree felony as indicated on the judgment. See § 782.04(2), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1998). We direct the trial court to correct the judgment to indicate that the conviction is for a first-degree felony.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, C.J., and SILBERMAN and COVINGTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

846 So. 2d 1201, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8295, 2003 WL 21275999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burttram-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack