Burton v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided February 7, 2024·No. 2:22-cv-02243·Unknown

Opinion

Roman Otkupman, SBN 249423 Roman@OLFLA.com Nidah Farishta, SBN 312360 Nidah@OLFLA.com CORPORATION 5743 Corsa Ave, Suite 123 Westlake Village, CA 91362 Telephone: (818) 293-5623 Facsimile: (888) 850-1310 Attorneys for Plaintiff

JAMES T. CONLEY, SBN 224174 james.conley@ogletree.com HAIDY M. RIVERA, SBN 332117 haidy.rivera@ogletree.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, 500 Capitol Mall, Suite 2500 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: 916-840-3150 Facsimile: 916-840-3159

Attorneys for Defendant WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARISSA BURTON, an individual, Case No. 2:22-cv-02243-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, STIPULATION REGARDING PRODUCTION OF CONFIDENTIAL vs. DOCUMENTS AND PROPRIETARY WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Action Filed: November 15, 2022 Trial Date: None set Defendants.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff MARISSA BURTON (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., (“Defendant”) (collectively, “the parties”), through their respective attorneys of record, that a Protective Order be entered by this Court as follows: 1. This Stipulation and Protective Order shall apply to the production and exchange of all document requests and documents, interrogatories and answers to interrogatories, depositions, request for admissions and responses to requests for admissions, exhibits, pleadings, admission of evidence at trial, and all other information exchanged and furnished in this action by the parties that are confidential and/or proprietary. 2. The parties acknowledge that discovery will require disclosure of information that is private, personal, privileged, confidential, proprietary, or nonpublic. As a result, the parties agree that they will be required to enter this Stipulation and Protective Order (hereinafter “Order”) on the following terms to ensure the continuing confidentiality of materials designated as Confidential Material in this litigation. Confidential Material, as used in this Order, shall refer to any document or item designated as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only”. The parties understand that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled under the applicable legal principles to treatment as confidential. Nothing in this Order shall require any party to produce any specific document or category of documents which a party deems inappropriate for production. I. Definitions of Confidential Material 3. Confidential Material, as used in this Order, consists of the following materials and categories of materials: (a) Materials relating to any privileged, confidential, or nonpublic information, including, but not limited to, trade secrets, research, design, development, financial, technical, marketing, planning, personal, or commercial information, as such terms are used in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and any applicable case law interpreting Federal Rule proprietary information, vendor agreements; personnel files; claim/litigation information; nonpublic policies and procedures; medical records; employment offers; competitive analyses, income statements; client or customer information; financial records and statements; vendor agreements, along with other proprietary or confidential information. (b) Materials containing corporate trade secrets, nonpublic research and development data, including, but not limited to, cost data, pricing formulas, inventory management programs, and other sales or business information known to the public; information obtained from a non-party pursuant to a non-disclosure agreement; and customer-related Protected Data shall be deemed “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only”. (c) “Protected Data” shall refer to any information that a party believes in good faith to be subject to federal, state or foreign data protection laws or other privacy obligations. Examples of such data protection laws include but are not limited to The Gramm-Leach- Bliley Act, 15 U.S.C. § 6801 et seq. (financial information); and, The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and the regulations thereunder, 45 CFR Part 160 and Subparts A and E of Part 164 (medical information). Certain Protected Data may compel alternative or additional protections beyond those afforded “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” material, in which event the parties shall meet and confer in good faith, and, if unsuccessful, shall move the Court for appropriate relief. 4. The parties shall not designate as confidential information that is already public knowledge. 5. The parties agree that such Confidential Material as described in paragraph 3 above, should be given the protection of an order of this Court to prevent injury through disclosure to persons other than those persons involved in the prosecution or defense of this litigation. A Protective Order will serve to achieve the following: expedite the flow of information, facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, adequately protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary end of the litigation. II. Procedure for Designating Information as Confidential 6. To designate information as confidential, the producing party shall mark Confidential Material with the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”. Parties shall submit confidential discovery responses, such as answers to interrogatories or answers to requests for admissions, in a separate document stamped with the appropriate legend designating those responses as Confidential Material. The Receiving Party may make copies of Confidential Material and such copies shall become subject to the same protections as the Confidential Material from which those copies were made. (a) Information on a disk or other electronic format (e.g., a native format production) may be designated confidential by marking the storage medium itself (or the native file’s title) with the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”. The Receiving Party shall mark any hard-copy printouts and the storage medium of any permissible copies of such electronic material with the corresponding legend contained on the original and such copies shall become subject to the same protections, as the Confidential Material from which those copies were made. (b) Information disclosed at any deposition of a party taken in this action may be designated by the party as confidential by indicating on the record at the deposition that the information is confidential and subject to the provisions of this Order. Alternatively, the party may designate information disclosed at the deposition as confidential by notifying the court reporter and other parties in writing, within fifteen (15) business days of receipt of the transcript, of the specific pages and lines of the transcript which are designated as confidential. The parties may agree to a reasonable extension of the 15-business-day period for designation. Designations of transcripts will apply to audio, video, or other recordings of the testimony. During such 15-business-day period, the entire transcript shall receive confidential treatment. Upon such designation, the court reporter and each party shall affix the “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” legend to the designated pages and segregate them as appropriate. produced, as follows: (1) The producing

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burton v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Burton v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. (Burton v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related