Burton v. Waggoner

Court of Appeals of Texas

Burton v. Waggoner

273 S.W. 648, 1925 Tex. App. LEXIS 495

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedMay 20, 1925

DocketNo. 7374.

StatusPublished

This text of 273 S.W. 648 (Burton v. Waggoner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burton v. Waggoner, 273 S.W. 648, 1925 Tex. App. LEXIS 495 (Tex. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

FLY, O. J.

Defendant in error sued plaintiff in error for $330, that he owed her for rent of a room which he had used for over a year. The court gave defendant in error judgment for her money.

The record in this case wa? filed in the Fort Worth Court of Civil Appeals, on May 17, 1924. No brief was filed in that court, and the -case was transferred to this court, and filed herein on January 23, 1925. The cause was set down for submission on May 13, 1925, and plaintiff in error’s attorneys duly notified of the intended submission. No brief was filed, and on May 11, 1925, defendant in error filed a motion to dismiss. Plaintiff in error filed briefs herein without permission-of this court after the cause had been submitted.

The delay of plaintiff in error is inexcusable, and the writ of error is dismissed for want of 'prosecution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FLY, O. J.

Defendant in error sued plaintiff in error for $330, that he owed her for rent of a room which he had used for over a year. The court gave defendant in error judgment for her money.

The record in this case wa? filed in the Fort Worth Court of Civil Appeals, on May 17, 1924. No brief was filed in that court, and the -case was transferred to this court, and filed herein on January 23, 1925. The cause was set down for submission on May 13, 1925, and plaintiff in error’s attorneys duly notified of the intended submission. No brief was filed, and on May 11, 1925, defendant in error filed a motion to dismiss. Plaintiff in error filed briefs herein without permission-of this court after the cause had been submitted.

The delay of plaintiff in error is inexcusable, and the writ of error is dismissed for want of 'prosecution.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 S.W. 648, 1925 Tex. App. LEXIS 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burton-v-waggoner-texapp-1925.