Burton v. W. Burton & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Burton v. W. Burton & Co.

168 A.D. 938

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 168 A.D. 938 (Burton v. W. Burton & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burton v. W. Burton & Co., 168 A.D. 938 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We think that the finding of the jury that there was a delivery of this stock by the defendant Burton to the ■ plaintiff was [939]*939against the weight of evidence. The judgment and order are, therefore, reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.; Laughlin and Scott, JJ., dissented and voted for affirmance. Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

We think that the finding of the jury that there was a delivery of this stock by the defendant Burton to the ■ plaintiff was [939]*939against the weight of evidence. The judgment and order are, therefore, reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.; Laughlin and Scott, JJ., dissented and voted for affirmance. Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 A.D. 938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burton-v-w-burton-co-nyappdiv-1915.