Burton v. Varnell

1 Tex. 635
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Burton v. Varnell. Read the opinion of the Court — 5 Tex. 139
Texas Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1846·Published

Opinion

Lipscomb, J.

There has been no brief filed by the plaintiff in error. From the record it appears that suit -was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff on a note of hand; that after answer had been filed there was a judgment for the plaintiff below, with a stay of execution — nine months. We believe that according to a sound rule of construction, we are bound to conclude that the [(446)]*(446)answer bad been waived, and the judgment entered by consent, and that it is in effect a judgment by confession. No proceeding being had until after the expiration of the nine months is a strong circumstance in support of this conclusion. The judgment must be affirmed with damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burton v. Varnell, 1 Tex. 635 (Tex. 1846).

1 Tex. 635 (Burton v. Varnell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.