Burton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Burton v. State

389 S.W.3d 747, 2013 WL 216366, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 75

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 22, 2013·No. No. ED 98374·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Christopher Burton, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Christopher Burton, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Burton v. State, 389 S.W.3d 747, 2013 WL 216366, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 75 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

389 S.W.3d 747 (Burton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.