Burton v. State

876 So. 2d 27, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6802, 2004 WL 1092157
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 18, 2004
DocketNo. 1D03-3575
StatusPublished

This text of 876 So. 2d 27 (Burton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burton v. State, 876 So. 2d 27, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6802, 2004 WL 1092157 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. State v. Mitchell, 866 So.2d 776 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Tabor v. State, 864 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). We certify the same question as one of great public importance:

DOES THE RYCE ACT REQUIRE THAT THE CURRENT INCARCERATION BE FOR A SEXUALLY VIOLENT OFFENSE?

WOLF, C.J., ERVIN and VAN NORTWICK, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Mitchell
866 So. 2d 776 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Tabor v. State
864 So. 2d 1171 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
876 So. 2d 27, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6802, 2004 WL 1092157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burton-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.