Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Burton v. State

Burton v. State

876 So. 2d 27, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6802, 2004 WL 1092157
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 18, 2004·No. No. 1D03-3575·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. State v. Mitchell, 866 So.2d 776 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Tabor v. State, 864 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). We certify the same question as one of great public importance:

DOES THE RYCE ACT REQUIRE THAT THE CURRENT INCARCERATION BE FOR A SEXUALLY VIOLENT OFFENSE?

WOLF, C.J., ERVIN and VAN NORTWICK, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burton v. State, 876 So. 2d 27, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6802, 2004 WL 1092157 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

876 So. 2d 27 (Burton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Mitchell
866 So. 2d 776 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Tabor v. State
864 So. 2d 1171 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)