Burton v. State

654 So. 2d 1027, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5243, 1995 WL 293732
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Burton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 651 So. 2d 793
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 16, 1995·No. No. 93-3935·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We review the denial of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to rule [1028]*10283.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm in part and reverse in part. The motion raised four grounds for relief, and we affirm the court’s denial of the motion on three grounds. In regard to appellant’s claim that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel refused to let appellant testify in his own behalf, however, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing. Wilson v. State, 647 So.2d 185 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

MINER, LAWRENCE and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burton v. State, 654 So. 2d 1027, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5243, 1995 WL 293732 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

654 So. 2d 1027 (Burton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. State
647 So. 2d 185 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)