Burton v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Burton v. State

669 S.W.2d 1, 282 Ark. 417, 1984 Ark. LEXIS 1664

DecidedMay 14, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 669 S.W.2d 1 (Burton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burton v. State, 669 S.W.2d 1, 282 Ark. 417, 1984 Ark. LEXIS 1664 (Ark. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Donald Ray Burton, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, James W. Haddock, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Donald Ray Burton, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, James W. Haddock, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

669 S.W.2d 1, 282 Ark. 417, 1984 Ark. LEXIS 1664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burton-v-state-ark-1984.