Burton v. Spring Mountain Treatment Center

Opinion

Burton, Case No. 2:24-cv-00449-CDS-DJA Plaintiff Order Adopting Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and Closing Case

Spring Mountain Treatment Center, [ECF No. 8] Defendant Magistrate Judge Daniel Albregts issued a report and recommendation (R&R) that this case be dismissed after plaintiff Ariana Burton failed to respond to an order to show cause for her failure to prosecute this case. R&@R, ECF No. 8. Burton had until October 31, 2024, to lodge any lobjections to the R@R. See id. at 2; Local Rule IB 3-2(a) (stating that parties wishing to object to jan RGR must file objections within fourteen days); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) (same). As of the date of this order, Burton has not objected to the recommendation, nor has she requested time to do so. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation objections are filed.” Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. Because no objection has been filed, I adopt the R&R in full and dismiss this action without prejudice for Burton’s failure to prosecute. Conclusion IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [ECF No. 8] is adopted in its entirety. This action is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is kindly directed to enter judgment accordingly and to close this case. Dated: November 12, 2024 / ) Lf sable — wm States District Judge