Burton v. Planning Commission

545 A.2d 1100, 208 Conn. 802, 1988 Conn. LEXIS 202
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Burton v. Planning Commission. Read the opinion of the Court — 209 Conn. 609
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided April 29, 1988·Published

Opinion

The plaintiff’s amended petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 13 Conn. App. 400, is granted, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court err in concluding that the late filing of the appellant’s brief required granting the motion to dismiss?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burton v. Planning Commission, 545 A.2d 1100, 208 Conn. 802, 1988 Conn. LEXIS 202 (Colo. 1988).

545 A.2d 1100 (Burton v. Planning Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burton v. Planning Commission
536 A.2d 995 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1988)