Burton v. Nichols

California Supreme Court

Burton v. Nichols

1 P. 896, 2 Cal. Unrep. 240

DecidedJanuary 17, 1884

StatusPublished

This text of 1 P. 896 (Burton v. Nichols) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burton v. Nichols, 1 P. 896, 2 Cal. Unrep. 240 (Cal. 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

By the COURT.

The only point made by appellant is that the evidence does not justify the finding that the lands described in the complaint are not situated within the boundaries of the rancho Jesus Maria as patented by the United States. The testimony of the witnesses called by the defendant at least created a substantial conflict with reference to the location of the demanded premises, and we cannot say that the evidence did not sustain the finding of the court.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the COURT.

The only point made by appellant is that the evidence does not justify the finding that the lands described in the complaint are not situated within the boundaries of the rancho Jesus Maria as patented by the United States. The testimony of the witnesses called by the defendant at least created a substantial conflict with reference to the location of the demanded premises, and we cannot say that the evidence did not sustain the finding of the court.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 P. 896, 2 Cal. Unrep. 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burton-v-nichols-cal-1884.