Burton v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.

123 A.D.2d 523, 506 N.Y.S.2d 966, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60291

This text of 123 A.D.2d 523 (Burton v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burton v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 123 A.D.2d 523, 506 N.Y.S.2d 966, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60291 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Plaintiff concedes that defendants’ motion to compel arbitration should have been granted (see, Flanagan v PrudentialBache Sec., 67 NY2d 500). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Grow, J.—arbitration.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Flanagan v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.
495 N.E.2d 345 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 A.D.2d 523, 506 N.Y.S.2d 966, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burton-v-dean-witter-reynolds-inc-nyappdiv-1986.