Burton v. Davis

203 A.D.3d 454, 160 N.Y.S.3d 864, 2022 NY Slip Op 01412
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 8, 2022
DocketIndex No. 26664/18E Appeal No. 15465 Case No. 2021-00960
StatusPublished

This text of 203 A.D.3d 454 (Burton v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burton v. Davis, 203 A.D.3d 454, 160 N.Y.S.3d 864, 2022 NY Slip Op 01412 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Burton v Davis (2022 NY Slip Op 01412)
Burton v Davis
2022 NY Slip Op 01412
Decided on March 08, 2022
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: March 08, 2022
Before: Acosta, P.J., Renwick, Webber, Kern, Friedman, JJ.

Index No. 26664/18E Appeal No. 15465 Case No. 2021-00960

[*1]Lanbert Burton, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

Peter I. Davis, Defendant, Vakabantene Diarrassouba, et al., Defendants-Respondents.


Michael H. Zhu P.C., New York (Michael H. Zhu of counsel), for appellant.

McCormick & Priore, P.C., New York (Steven R. Gustavson of counsel), for respondents.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann Brigantti, J.), entered March 16, 2021, which denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this action for personal injuries sustained in a collision between defendants' vehicle and plaintiff's vehicle, triable issues exist as to how the accident occurred, as plaintiff and defendant Diarrassouba provided conflicting versions of the accident (see Savall v New York City Tr. Auth., 173 AD3d 566, 567 [1st Dept 2019]). The sole basis for plaintiff's claim that Diarrassouba was in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 1128(a)

and 1163(a) is plaintiff's affidavit, which was contradicted by the assertions made by Diarrassouba in his affidavit submitted in opposition to the motion.

We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: March 8, 2022



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431
§ 1128
New York VAT § 1128(a)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 A.D.3d 454, 160 N.Y.S.3d 864, 2022 NY Slip Op 01412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burton-v-davis-nyappdiv-2022.