Burton v. City of New York

83 A.D.3d 635, 919 N.Y.S.2d 910

This text of 83 A.D.3d 635 (Burton v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burton v. City of New York, 83 A.D.3d 635, 919 N.Y.S.2d 910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Keyspan Energy Delivery appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Velasquez, J.), dated October 30, 2009, which granted the motion of Lola Lolita Burton for leave to be substituted, as personal representative of the estate of Semroy Burton, for Semroy Burton, and to amend the caption accordingly.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the motion of Lola Lolita Burton (hereinafter Burton), for leave to be substituted, as personal representative of the estate of Semroy Burton, for Semroy Burton, and to amend the caption accordingly, in this action to recover damages for personal injuries. Contrary to the contention of the defendant Keyspan Energy Delivery, as the personal representative of the nondomiciliary decedent, authorized to so act by the State of Connecticut, Burton is a proper party to prosecute the action in accordance with the provisions of EPTL 13-3.5 (see CPLR 1015; EPTL 13-3.5; see also Turano, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 17B, EPTL 13-3.5). Mastro, J.P., Skelos, Balkin and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 A.D.3d 635, 919 N.Y.S.2d 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burton-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2011.