Burton v. Bloomingdale Greens, Inc.

274 A.D.2d 405, 711 N.Y.S.2d 766, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7733

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to establish title to real property by adverse possession, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Ponterio, J.), dated August 30, 1999, which denied his motion to preliminarily enjoin the defendants from performing construction work on the property.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction. Contrary to the plaintiffs contentions he failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits (see, Van Valkenburgh v Lutz, 304 NY 95; Weinstein Enters. v Cappelletti, 217 AD2d 616, 618; Yamin v Daly, 205 AD2d 870, 871) and that he would suffer irreparable injury absent the injunction (see, Wallack Frgt. Lines v Next Day Express, 245 AD2d 367). Bracken, J. P., Joy, McGinity and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burton v. Bloomingdale Greens, Inc., 274 A.D.2d 405, 711 N.Y.S.2d 766, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7733 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

274 A.D.2d 405 (Burton v. Bloomingdale Greens, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Van Valkenburgh v. Lutz
106 N.E.2d 28 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)
Yamin v. Daly
205 A.D.2d 870 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Weinstein Enterprises, Inc. v. Cappelletti
217 A.D.2d 616 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Wallack Freight Lines, Inc. v. Next Day Express, Inc.
245 A.D.2d 367 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)