Burton, Arthur Lee

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Burton, Arthur Lee

DecidedApril 22, 2009

DocketWR-64,360-02

StatusPublished

This text of Burton, Arthur Lee (Burton, Arthur Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burton, Arthur Lee, (Tex. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

WR- 64,360-02 EX PARTE ARTHUR LEE BURTON

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 760321-B IN THE 338^TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

HARRIS COUNTY

Per Curiam.

O R D E R

This is a post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to the provisions of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 11.071.

In June 1998, applicant was convicted of the offense of capital murder. The jury answered the special issues submitted pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 37.071, and the trial court, accordingly, set punishment at death. Applicant filed the instant writ application in which he challenges the validity of his conviction and punishment. Subsequently, on direct appeal, this Court affirmed applicant's conviction but reversed and remanded for a new punishment trial. Burton v. State, No. AP-73,204 (Tex. Crim. App. March 7, 2001)(not designated for publication). Applicant was retried on punishment and sentenced to death a second time on September 6, 2002. This Court affirmed applicant's second punishment judgment. Burton v. State, No. AP-73,204 (Tex. Crim. App. May 19, 2004)(not designated for publication).

Applicant presents sixteen allegations in this application in which he challenges the validity of his conviction and punishment. The trial judge entered findings of fact and conclusions of law, and recommended that relief be denied. After reviewing the record, we adopted the trial judge's findings, and denied relief. Ex parte Burton, No. WR-64,360-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Nov. 7, 2007)(not designated for publication). However, on February 6, 2008, the Court on its own motion decided to reconsider its decision. The Court has finished its review. We again adopt the trial judge's findings, and based upon the trial court's findings and conclusions and our own review, the relief sought is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 22^ND DAY OF APRIL, 2009.

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

WR- 64,360-02 EX PARTE ARTHUR LEE BURTON

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 760321-B IN THE 338^TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

HARRIS COUNTY

Per Curiam.

O R D E R

This is a post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to the provisions of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 11.071.

In June 1998, applicant was convicted of the offense of capital murder. The jury answered the special issues submitted pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 37.071, and the trial court, accordingly, set punishment at death. Applicant filed the instant writ application in which he challenges the validity of his conviction and punishment. Subsequently, on direct appeal, this Court affirmed applicant's conviction but reversed and remanded for a new punishment trial. Burton v. State, No. AP-73,204 (Tex. Crim. App. March 7, 2001)(not designated for publication). Applicant was retried on punishment and sentenced to death a second time on September 6, 2002. This Court affirmed applicant's second punishment judgment. Burton v. State, No. AP-73,204 (Tex. Crim. App. May 19, 2004)(not designated for publication).

Applicant presents sixteen allegations in this application in which he challenges the validity of his conviction and punishment. The trial judge entered findings of fact and conclusions of law, and recommended that relief be denied. After reviewing the record, we adopted the trial judge's findings, and denied relief. Ex parte Burton, No. WR-64,360-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Nov. 7, 2007)(not designated for publication). However, on February 6, 2008, the Court on its own motion decided to reconsider its decision. The Court has finished its review. We again adopt the trial judge's findings, and based upon the trial court's findings and conclusions and our own review, the relief sought is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 22^ND DAY OF APRIL, 2009.

Do Not Publish

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Burton, Arthur Lee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burton-arthur-lee-texcrimapp-2009.