Burtis v. The Restless

E.D. New York

Burtis v. The Restless

78 F. 927, 1896 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108

DecidedDecember 2, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 78 F. 927 (Burtis v. The Restless) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burtis v. The Restless, 78 F. 927, 1896 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108 (E.D.N.Y. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

BENEDICT, District Judge,

in this case the same questions arise as In the case of The Glen Iris, 78 Fed. 511, except that there is no claim for damage by negligent towing, and no necessity for making a rest in any of the monthly bills on that account. Let the fees of the officers of court be first paid, and then the claims for which libels had been filed within 40 days of the date of each monthly bill, with costs pro rata, if there be not enough for all.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BENEDICT, District Judge,

in this case the same questions arise as In the case of The Glen Iris, 78 Fed. 511, except that there is no claim for damage by negligent towing, and no necessity for making a rest in any of the monthly bills on that account. Let the fees of the officers of court be first paid, and then the claims for which libels had been filed within 40 days of the date of each monthly bill, with costs pro rata, if there be not enough for all.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 F. 927, 1896 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burtis-v-the-restless-nyed-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack