Burtis v. Brush

1 Redf. 448
CourtNew York Surrogate's Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1862
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Redf. 448 (Burtis v. Brush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burtis v. Brush, 1 Redf. 448 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1862).

Opinion

The Surrogate. — The minor, Sylvanus A. Burtis, having arrived at age, the guardian had no authority to purchase the mortgaged premises in behalf of his ward. He must, therefore, account to him for the amount realized under the-sale of foreclosure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Redf. 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burtis-v-brush-nysurct-1862.