Burtaine v. Barr
This text of 194 A.D. 906 (Burtaine v. Barr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings denied, with ten dollars costs. A temporary receiver appointed in a foreclosure action has no authority to oust tenants in lawful possession under existing leases made by the owner of the property. His possession is subject to the tenancies in existence at the date of his appointment. Appointment of such receiver does not transfer title to the property. Jenks, P. J., Rich, Putnam, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ., concur. Order reversed, wdth ten dollars costs and disbursements, and plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings denied, with ten dollars costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
194 A.D. 906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burtaine-v-barr-nyappdiv-1920.