Burt v. Stocks Coal Co.

46 S.E. 828, 119 Ga. 629, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 313
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 3, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 46 S.E. 828 (Burt v. Stocks Coal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burt v. Stocks Coal Co., 46 S.E. 828, 119 Ga. 629, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 313 (Ga. 1904).

Opinion

Lamar, J.

(after stating the foregoing facts.) It is not neces'sary to determine whether Civil Code, § 2866, par. 8, was intended to make a distinction between trade and profession; for the phrase “common tools of trade” therein has uniformly been construed to refer, not to tools in common use by the debtor regardless of their value, but to those simple and inexpensive appliances used in his [630]*630■trade. Lenoir v. Weeks, 20 Ga. 596; Kirksey v. Rowe, 114 Ga. 893. Nor does the dentist chair come within the Civil Code, §2866,par. 5, exempting “one table and set of chairs sufficient for the use of the family.” Indeed it was not so scheduled when the petition was filed. The chair may be set apart, as exempt from levy and sale, .under the Civil Code, § 2827, but not under § 2866.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Simmons, G. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nell Cady
S.D. Georgia, 2025
Curry v. Dial Finance Corp. (In Re Curry)
18 B.R. 358 (N.D. Georgia, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 S.E. 828, 119 Ga. 629, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burt-v-stocks-coal-co-ga-1904.