Burt v. State

791 So. 2d 594, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11890, 2001 WL 947067
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 22, 2001·No. No. 3D00-2188·Published

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to the State’s confession of error, we reverse the trial court’s order denying the defendant’s motion to correct illegal sentence and remand for resentenc-ing. The State properly concedes that because the defendant was sentenced as a violent career criminal and committed his [595] crimes on February 1, 1996, he has standing to challenge the law under which he was sentenced. See Salters v. State, 758 So.2d 667, 671 (Fla.2000). Therefore, this cause is remanded for resentencing in accordance with the valid laws in effect on the date of the defendant’s offenses. See State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643, 649 (Fla.1999); Lee v. State, 770 So.2d 231, 232 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burt v. State, 791 So. 2d 594, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11890, 2001 WL 947067 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

791 So. 2d 594 (Burt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Salters v. State
758 So. 2d 667 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
State v. Thompson
750 So. 2d 643 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Lee v. State
770 So. 2d 231 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)