Burt v. Ozmint

440 F. App'x 200
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Burt v. Ozmint. Read the opinion of the Court — 479 F. App'x 551
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 26, 2011·No. No. 11-6544·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Burt seeks to appeal the district court’s order notifying the parties of certain administrative requirements and requiring Burt to notify the court of any changes of address. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Burt seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burt v. Ozmint, 440 F. App'x 200 (4th Cir. 2011).

440 F. App'x 200 (Burt v. Ozmint) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)