Burt v. Fraser

47 So. 573, 157 Ala. 574, 1908 Ala. LEXIS 170
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedNovember 19, 1908
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 47 So. 573 (Burt v. Fraser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burt v. Fraser, 47 So. 573, 157 Ala. 574, 1908 Ala. LEXIS 170 (Ala. 1908).

Opinion

ANDERSON, J.

— In order for the court to have rendered a valid judgment by default against the defendant, it must affirmatively appear that jurisdiction of his person had been acquired by the service of process upon him in the mode and manner prescribed by law. 11 Cyc. 666. The return of the summons in the case at bar was: “I have executed this writ Jan. 14th, 1908, by leaving a copy of the within summons and complaint at-the home of the defendant, W. B. Burt.” Section 5301 of the Code of 1907 (section 3272 of Code of 1896) requires that the summons must be executed by leaving a copy of the summons and complaint with the defendant. Leaving it at his home is not sufficient. —Melvin v. Clark, 45 Ala. 385.

The foregoing statute is unlike section 4022, Code 1907 (section 1826, Code 1896) as to serving subpoenas on witnesses. Subpoenas may be executed by personal service, or by leaving a copy at the place of residence of the witness; but a summons must be served by leaving a copy with the defendant. Leaving it at his home will not be sufficient.

The circuit court erred in rendering the judgment complained of, which is accordingly reversed, and the cause is remanded, in order that plaintiffs may obtain legal service if they desire.

Reversed and remanded.

Tyson, C, J., and Dowdelb and MoCbebtan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henry v. Drennen Motor Car Co.
180 So. 563 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1938)
Eidson v. McDaniel
114 So. 204 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1927)
Barton v. Burton Mfg. Co.
79 So. 664 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 So. 573, 157 Ala. 574, 1908 Ala. LEXIS 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burt-v-fraser-ala-1908.