Burt v. Allen

123 So. 409, 11 La. App. 290, 1929 La. App. LEXIS 634
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided June 28, 1929·No. No. 475·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ELLIOTT, J.

Mrs. Thomas R Burt, claiming of Sidney Allen $104.94 as the balance due on an account, instituted suit against him for recovery in the city court of Bogalusa.

The defendant Allen for answer admitted owing plaintiff $62 of the amount claimed, and tendered same in court to the plaintiff, leaving it in the hands of the clerk of court. He denied owing the balance of the amount claimed.

The lower court rendered judgment holding that the amount tendered was all the defendant owed, and ordered plaintiff to accept same in full payment.

Plaintiff has appealed.

When defendant admitted owing plaintiff $62 of the amount claimed and paid it into the registry of the court, then there remained but $42.94 in dispute. The amount in dispute therefore does not come within the jurisdiction of this court ratione materia. Hood vs. Wise, 128 La. 731, 55 So. 335; O’Shee vs. Chaudoir, 154 La. 517, 97 So. 796.

The appeal is dismissed.

MOUTON, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burt v. Allen, 123 So. 409, 11 La. App. 290, 1929 La. App. LEXIS 634 (La. Ct. App. 1929).

123 So. 409 (Burt v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. Hawthorne
133 So. 532 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1931)