Burt v. Allen

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Burt v. Allen

123 So. 409, 11 La. App. 290, 1929 La. App. LEXIS 634

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 28, 1929

DocketNo. 475

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 123 So. 409 (Burt v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burt v. Allen, 123 So. 409, 11 La. App. 290, 1929 La. App. LEXIS 634 (La. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

ELLIOTT, J.

Mrs. Thomas R Burt, claiming of Sidney Allen $104.94 as the balance due on an account, instituted suit against him for recovery in the city court of Bogalusa.

The defendant Allen for answer admitted owing plaintiff $62 of the amount claimed, and tendered same in court to the plaintiff, leaving it in the hands of the clerk of court. He denied owing the balance of the amount claimed.

The lower court rendered judgment holding that the amount tendered was all the defendant owed, and ordered plaintiff to accept same in full payment.

Plaintiff has appealed.

When defendant admitted owing plaintiff $62 of the amount claimed and paid it into the registry of the court, then there remained but $42.94 in dispute. The amount in dispute therefore does not come within the jurisdiction of this court ratione materia. Hood vs. Wise, 128 La. 731, 55 So. 335; O’Shee vs. Chaudoir, 154 La. 517, 97 So. 796.

The appeal is dismissed.

MOUTON, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI