Burt & Mason v. Hurlburt
This text of 16 Vt. 292 (Burt & Mason v. Hurlburt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The county court have adjudged Slason trustee, and, unless it appears from the disclosure, or from facts found by the county court, that some erroneous decision of a question of law has been made, the judgment of the county court must be affirmed.
From the disclosure it appears that Slason executed a negotiable promissory note, payable to Hurlburt, or order, for $690.12; no question is made as to that note; at the time it was given, and when the writ in this case was served, it was not subject to the trustee process. The trustee was held chargeable for the rent due and accruing up to the time Hurlburt and his wife were divorced. This amount was in his hands, and had not been assigned to any person. The request signed by Hurlburt to Slason, to pay his several creditors, named in the disclosure, was not accepted by them. There was no transfer to them, and it does not appear that the trustee ever agreed or promised to pay them. He remained a debtor to Hurlburt, the principal defendant, for that amount, and was rightly adjudged trustee.
The judgment of the county court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 Vt. 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burt-mason-v-hurlburt-vt-1844.