Burt Holt v. Amarild Ushe
This text of Burt Holt v. Amarild Ushe (Burt Holt v. Amarild Ushe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
August 2, 2017 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice
Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack 156035 & (108)(109)(115) David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen BURT HOLT, Kurtis T. Wilder, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices
v SC: 156035 COA: 330076 Wayne CC: 12-007202-NI AMARILD USHE and RELIABLE TRANSPORTATION SPECIALISTS, INC., Defendants-Appellants, and CONTAINERPORT GROUP, INC., Defendant. _________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration and the motion to file reply brief are GRANTED. The motion to confirm maintenance of stay pending appeal without further bond is DENIED.
The application for leave to appeal the May 23, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals remains pending.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. August 2, 2017 d0801 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Burt Holt v. Amarild Ushe, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burt-holt-v-amarild-ushe-mich-2017.