Burstyn v. City of Aventura

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 8, 2015·No. 13-0027 & 13-0026 & 13-0025·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed April 8, 2015. ________________

Nos. 3D13-27, 3D13-26, & 3D13-25 Lower Tribunal Nos. 09-70721, 09-70726, & 10-36073 ________________

David Burstyn, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, et al., Appellants,

vs.

City of Aventura, et al., Appellees.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, David C. Miller, Judge.

Schuler, Halvorson, Weisser & Zoeller, P.A., and Jason D. Weisser and David M. Kerner (West Palm Beach); Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., and Andrew A. Harris (West Palm Beach), for appellants.

Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke, Piper & Hochman, P.A., and E. Bruce Johnson and Christopher J. Stearns (Fort Lauderdale), for appellees City of Aventura, City of Miami Gardens, and Village of Bal Harbour.

Before LAGOA, SALTER, and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM. Based upon appellees’ confession of error, and Masone v. City of Aventura,

147 So. 3d 492 (Fla. 2014), we reverse the final judgments and remand to the trial

court for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burstyn v. City of Aventura, (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Burstyn v. City of Aventura (Burstyn v. City of Aventura) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richard Masone v. City of Aventura
147 So. 3d 492 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2014)