Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Burstiner v. City of East Orange

Burstiner v. City of East Orange

134 A. 916, 103 N.J.L. 174, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 275
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Burstiner v. City of East Orange. Read the opinion of the Court — 100 N.J.L. 385 →
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 18, 1926·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Bus-kirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burstiner v. City of East Orange, 134 A. 916, 103 N.J.L. 174, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 275 (N.J. 1926).

134 A. 916 (Burstiner v. City of East Orange) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.